My complaint:
Joe Reid was intentionally indecent to offend viewers based on a previous show having the president on for an interview.
Joe Reid implicated noone in particular, and anyone of wanting to force or jam something down her throat.
I believe that based on my previously reporting a complaint about Ari Melber that she acted on behalf of Ari Melber to want to encourage more complaints to discard by saying things with malice, such as open ended statements left for interpretation, or her own parinoia- to deflect viewers solely based on her own parinoias as retaliation for people with diagnosis making complaints.
I believe this based on posting about MSNBC favoring viewers that have made complaints- without correcting their behavior, to further harass viewers for complaining- then treating it like a game of hot potato by showing compassion only as aimed insults to provoke and pretend to be passive while taking turns mocking the same viewers before and after pandering to viewers who do not wish to be targeted either way.
I based this on posting a Facebook profile picture with the world’s ugliest dog which had a deformity of unusable hind legs bc it’s adorable and represents how I felt at the time of posting it: like an exploited animal that is harassed only to be excluded, based on Msnbc’s parinoias , exclusion, and exploits to one another and at viewers, which seems to be the over all undertone for MSNBC when holding viewers in contempt for themselves assuming people don’t respect their line of work in front of cameras.
I believe that because of this, Mika (I don’t know her last name) of Morning Joe commenting about not having legs to stand on, as if it’s other people’s fault that she cannot control drawing the wrong kind of attention to scrutinize viewers.
Because she blurts out things uncontrollably, I suspect it is to scrutinize viewers- bc she doesn’t have Tourettes, so it wasn’t involuntary.
I believe Mica spoke about not having legs to stand on to fit a stereotype that’s convenient for her when pretending to be dumb (which she clearly isn’t) based on my Facebook profile picture, to express myself, while attempting to make it a point that I do not value their opinions toward viewers they prefer to treat like human garbage- my dog picture was to ignore Msnbcs hateful undertone I’m between news.
From there, (Mika’s comment) I believe that bc I had taken her no legs comment at face value and dismissed it completely that Joy Reid wanted to try to coax a response by speaking out of context to implicate and exclude me personally from wanting to follow breaking news, as I exercise and watch news, so I try and follow news.
I believe her intent was to communicate that my complaints make no difference, and add that Joy Reid is also ok mocking viewers,.or.appearomg to mock viewers- that are not to her preference, simply bc the president was on a previous show on MSNBC, and so Joy Reid expected viewers might watch her show for follow up or better understanding breaking news, and wanted to make sexual innuendo to mock viewers based on the opportunity and based on speaking out of context and opposite of the issues pertaining to affirmative action ahead of having discussions with guests about it to discriminate based on her parinoias, to implicate people with diagnosis as parinoid, and to encourage continued complaints to delegitimize complaints I made after already hinting that MSNBC will not be censored even if only ti offend viewers, to offend me first, and anyone else shes scared about, like politicians.in gwneral l, along with viewers MSNBC stereotypes while championing acting like spoiled 17 yr olds who are about to get the records wiped clean.
Summery: they still exploit viewers, exclude viewers, and want to use parinoias to target viewers as apart of culture- yet still: to exclude and distract viewers they alianate from just wanting to tune in to listen to news, which I suspect is to use viewers as catalysts for injustices MSNBC reports about, to harass viewers who face worse treatment, such as from news hosts who don’t know how not to constantly refer to people who they shouldn’t constantly refer to, to suggest indirectly that in particular viewers likely are responsable for their injustices, just for taking interest in current affairs.
I also believe it’s just a continuance of harassment, potentially, for me making a complaint, which I believe originated by their trying to provoke and exploit mental diagnosis of those who also have physical disobilities, who they want to offend, or ignore when people speak up to draw attention to with harassment based on class (or based on having the president on a previous show on that channel) in between discussing current affairs regarding race, and while encouraging others to stand up against racism- but while using politic news to exploit to set trends with culture, while conditioning viewers like it’s a game of hot potato to discredit them indefinitely, especially for speaking up against bullying – in my case: based solely only being puerto rican first, before using specific viewers they discredit to suggest all or most Puerto Rican are racist or predators, based on specific viewers disabilities, and should be treated as Republicans buy with less protection from bullying.
Basically, Joy Reid wants to condemn Puerto Ricans bc she suspects I could be racist, which she suggests indirectly, and which is not true- but reiterated indirectly with inappropriate conditioning Infront of a wide audience that is supposed to be, I’m guessing, reassurance to those she/they single out- in the form of mockery -to support Ari Melbers school yard bullying.
The subtle suggestions are as a precursor for more blame of I simply allow them to hate individuals different from themselves, despite having a (good) president as a guest.
It also doesn’t help that the women on that network who host act independent but are clearly codependent on male news anchors both on and off the screen.
I’m simply tired for being treated like a citizen with little credibility or rights who is unequal just bc Joy Reid wants to showcase her own parinoia about her wig, and other woman support equality as long as they themselves dont have to in their own personal lives (on display in news). It’s as aggravating as the sexist men who clearly want to belittle disabled people so women who care will feel self conscience and co dependant, have sex with their co workers, then call that liberal, in attempt to provoke viewers on Ari Melbers.behalf, or male affiliates behalf- bc Ari primarily acts like a brown skinhead, based on privilege -as in he’s racist toward Puerto Ricans while pretending he can’t be bc he likes black culture, and I suspect hes just trying to show support for a local drug dealer that is responsible for dealing drugs to children on skinheads behalf, who cops never policed until skinheads worked with police just enough to admit they did some bad things but are now rehabilitated.
In summery: the women follow men’s lead and scapegoat just bc their tall which makes it ok to be sexist to the women that most regulars in MSNBC treat as less relevant, despite hollow compliments.
Their behavior is as obvious and sexist as it is protest off of scapegoating viewers, which is ok to women who like to be around a lot of tall men. Then everyone acts witty but is fully aware of how stupid they sound when making false charges and blasphemous statements- like when Joy Reid wants to scream to the world about things being forced down her throat, which was meant to encourage complaints… by cripples who are tired of MSNBC pandering to fear for attention and making a mockery of real issues… When they police viewers with malice.
I’m concerned about Ari Melber and other liberal progressives wanting to treat Puerto Ricans or Hispanics in general like many white people have wrongly treated black people throughout history as compensation for black people leading everybody into a new era where racism isn’t tolerated- to discredit and blame Latin people as racist or to punish Hispanic people based on leading icons parinoias (such as Joy Reid) specifically bc Ari Melber wants to promote privilege as a full blown racist who is never recognized as such, bc he happens to act racist in-between being informative for the right reasons… Like John Heileman.
MSNBC: tall ugly privileged men who mock crippled viewers to have sex with eachother while getting more monogamous female hosts to say dumb things for fun, in between smart serious things.
Suggested solution:
Stop talking to viewers hatefully, then making it a point that they do that, to base talking hatefully off camera on individuals who they further scapegoat after targeting even when refraining from acting like little rich white babies (even if their not white).
